Aiutamici Forum
Benvenuto Ospite Cerca | Topic Attivi | Utenti | | Log In | Registra

Video migliore Opzioni
venac
Inviato: Sunday, February 12, 2017 5:24:55 PM
Rank: AiutAmico

Iscritto dal : 4/29/2014
Posts: 44
Allego due report di uno stesso video avente due formati diversi.
Qual'è quello che può avere la maggiore qualità?
Grazie

PRIMO VIDEO

[ About file ]

Name: 1.mp4
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 10:35:57 +0100
Size: 1,870,928,321 bytes (1784.256 MiB)

[ Magic ]

Tipo file: ISO Media, MPEG v4 system, version 1

[ Generic infos ]

Duration: 01:30:35 (5434.847 s)
Container: MP4/MOV
Major brand: ISO Base Media version 512
Compatible brands: JVT AVC
Creation time: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100
Modification time: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100
Total tracks: 2
Track nr. 1: video (avc1) [VideoHandler]
Track nr. 2: audio (mp4a) [SoundHandler]
[debug] unknown id: 0x736d6864 (smhd), parent=0x6d696e66 (minf), level=4
[debug] unknown id: 0x75647461 (udta), parent=0x6d6f6f76 (moov), level=1

[ Relevant data ]

Resolution: 1280 x 720
Width: multiple of 32
Height: multiple of 16
Average DRF: 9.833
Standard deviation: 2.565
Std. dev. weighted mean: 2.064

[ Video track ]

Codec: avc1
Resolution: 1280 x 720
Frame aspect ratio: 16:9 = 1.778
Pixel aspect ratio: 1:1 = 1
Display aspect ratio: 16:9 = 1.778
Framerate: 23.976 fps
Bitrate: 2557.745 kbps
Duration (bs): 01:30:35 (5434.846 s)
Qf: 0.116

[ Audio track ]

Codec: mp4a
Bitrate: 192 kbps
Bitstream type (bs): MPEG-1 Layer III
Frames (bs): 226,424
Duration (bs): 01:30:34 (5434.176 s)
Chunk-aligned (bs): Yes
Bitrate (bs): 192 kbps CBR
Sampling frequency (bs): 48000 Hz
Mode (bs): stereo
Padding (bs): No
Emphasis (bs): none

[ Video bitstream ]

Bitstream type: MPEG-4 Part 10
User data: x264 | core 130 r2273 b3065e6 | H.264/MPEG-4 AVC codec
User data: Copyleft 2003-2013 | http://www.videolan.org/x264.html | cabac=1
User data: ref=8 | deblock=1:-2:-2 | analyse=0x3:0x113 | me=umh | subme=9
User data: psy=1 | psy_rd=1.00:0.25 | mixed_ref=0 | me_range=48 | chroma_me=1
User data: trellis=1 | 8x8dct=1 | cqm=0 | deadzone=6,6 | fast_pskip=0
User data: chroma_qp_offset=-4 | threads=24 | lookahead_threads=2
User data: sliced_threads=0 | nr=0 | decimate=0 | interlaced=0
User data: bluray_compat=0 | constrained_intra=0 | bframes=4 | b_pyramid=2
User data: b_adapt=2 | b_bias=0 | direct=3 | weightb=1 | open_gop=0 | weightp=2
User data: keyint=240 | keyint_min=24 | scenecut=40 | intra_refresh=0
User data: rc_lookahead=10 | rc=2pass | mbtree=1 | bitrate=2560 | ratetol=1.0
User data: qcomp=0.00 | qpmin=0 | qpmax=69 | qpstep=4 | cplxblur=20.0
User data: qblur=0.5 | vbv_maxrate=20000 | vbv_bufsize=25000 | nal_hrd=none
User data: ip_ratio=1.10 | aq=1:1.00
SPS id: 0
Profile: High@L4
Num ref frames: 8
Aspect ratio: Square pixels
Chroma format: YUV 4:2:0
PPS id: 0 (SPS: 0)
Entropy coding type: CABAC
Weighted prediction: P slices - explicit weighted prediction
Weighted bipred idc: B slices - implicit weighted prediction
8x8dct: Yes
Total frames: 130,306
Drop/delay frames: 0
Corrupt frames: 0

P-slices: 34771 ( 26.684 %) #####
B-slices: 94292 ( 72.362 %) ##############
I-slices: 1243 ( 0.954 %)
SP-slices: 0 ( 0.000 %)
SI-slices: 0 ( 0.000 %)

[ DRF analysis ]

average DRF: 9.833
standard deviation: 2.565
max DRF: 13

DRF=1: 1416 ( 1.087 %)
DRF=2: 1200 ( 0.921 %)
DRF=3: 1581 ( 1.213 %)
DRF=4: 1513 ( 1.161 %)
DRF=5: 1573 ( 1.207 %)
DRF=6: 2874 ( 2.206 %)
DRF=7: 11205 ( 8.599 %) ##
DRF=8: 15297 ( 11.739 %) ##
DRF=9: 12709 ( 9.753 %) ##
DRF=10: 5694 ( 4.370 %) #
DRF=11: 26513 ( 20.347 %) ####
DRF=12: 48124 ( 36.932 %) #######
DRF=13: 28 ( 0.021 %)
DRF>13: 0 ( 0.000 %)

P-slices average DRF: 7.533
P-slices std. deviation: 2.792
P-slices max DRF: 12

B-slices average DRF: 10.729
B-slices std. deviation: 1.788
B-slices max DRF: 13

I-slices average DRF: 6.233
I-slices std. deviation: 2.685
I-slices max DRF: 12

[ Profile compliancy ]

Selected profile: MTK PAL 6000
Resolution: 1280 x 720 > 720 x 576
Framerate: 23.976 <> 25
Buffer underflow: 00:01:16 (frame 1815)
Buffer underflow: 00:01:16 (frame 1827)
Buffer underflow: 00:01:26 (frame 2069)
Buffer underflow: 00:01:28 (frame 2102)
Buffer underflow: 00:01:59 (frame 2856)
Buffer underflow: 00:02:00 (frame 2866)
Buffer underflow: 00:03:52 (frame 5574)
Buffer underflow: 00:03:53 (frame 5582)
Buffer underflow: 00:15:11 (frame 21832)
Buffer underflow: 00:15:14 (frame 21911)

This report was created by AVInaptic (25-07-2011) on 12-02-2017 16:29:38


SECONDO VIDEO

[ About file ]

Name: 2.avi
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 11:00:13 +0100
Size: 1,842,993,152 bytes (1757.615 MiB)

[ Magic ]

Tipo file: RIFF (little-endian) data, AVI, 720 x 304, 23.98 fps, video: XviD, audio: Dolby AC3 (stereo, 48000 Hz)

[ Generic infos ]

Duration: 01:30:35 (5434.852 s)
Container: AVI OpenDML
AVI has index: Yes
Total tracks: 2
Track nr. 0: video
Track nr. 1: audio
ISFT: Nandub v1.0rc2
INAM: Io Sono Vendetta 2016
ISBJ: Io Sono Vendetta 2016
IART: MatrixCrew
ICOP: BRRip
ICMT: AC3
Junk: Nandub build 1853/release

[ Relevant data ]

Resolution: 720 x 304
Width: multiple of 16
Height: multiple of 16
Average DRF: 1.899
Standard deviation: 0.828
Std. dev. weighted mean: 0.8

[ Video track ]

FourCC: XVID/XVID
Resolution: 720 x 304
Frame aspect ratio: 45:19 = 2.368 (~2.35:1)
Pixel aspect ratio: 1:1 = 1
Display aspect ratio: 45:19 = 2.368 (~2.35:1)
Framerate: 23.976 fps
Total frames: 130,306
Stream size: 1,706,228,510 bytes (1627.186 MiB)
Bitrate: 2511.537 kbps
Qf: 0.479
Key frames: 1,340 (0; 34; 284; 534; 577; ... 130104)
Null frames: 0
Min key int: 1
Max key int: 250
Avg key int: 97.243
Delay: 0 ms

[ Audio track ]

Audio tag: 0x2000 (AC3)
Channels: 2
Chunks: 130,296
Stream size: 130,434,816 bytes (124.392 MiB)
Bitstream type (bs): AC3
Frames (bs): 169,837
Duration (bs): 01:30:35 (5434.784 s)
Chunk-aligned (bs): Yes
Bitrate (bs): 192 kbps CBR
Sampling frequency (bs): 48000 Hz
Mode (bs): stereo
Preload: 480 ms
Max A/V diff: 480 ms
Delay: 0 ms

[ Video bitstream ]

Bitstream type: MPEG-4 Part 2
User data: XviD0067
Packed bitstream: No
QPel: No
GMC: No
Interlaced: No
Aspect ratio: Square pixels
Quant type: H.263
Total frames: 130,306
Drop/delay frames: 0
Corrupt frames: 0

I-VOPs: 1340 ( 1.028 %)
P-VOPs: 65345 ( 50.147 %) ##########
B-VOPs: 63621 ( 48.824 %) ##########
S-VOPs: 0 ( 0.000 %)
N-VOPs: 0 ( 0.000 %)

Max consecutive B-VOPs: 1

[ DRF analysis ]

average DRF: 1.899
standard deviation: 0.828
max DRF: 14

DRF=1: 46639 ( 35.792 %) #######
DRF=2: 53879 ( 41.348 %) ########
DRF=3: 26866 ( 20.618 %) ####
DRF=4: 2540 ( 1.949 %)
DRF=5: 131 ( 0.101 %)
DRF=6: 192 ( 0.147 %)
DRF=7: 36 ( 0.028 %)
DRF=8: 4 ( 0.003 %)
DRF=9: 10 ( 0.008 %)
DRF>9: 9 ( 0.007 %)

I-VOPs average DRF: 1.148
I-VOPs std. deviation: 0.361
I-VOPs max DRF: 3

P-VOPs average DRF: 1.737
P-VOPs std. deviation: 0.714
P-VOPs max DRF: 9

B-VOPs average DRF: 2.082
B-VOPs std. deviation: 0.897
B-VOPs max DRF: 14

[ Profile compliancy ]

Selected profile: MTK PAL 6000
Resolution: Ok
Framerate: 23.976 <> 25
Min buffer fill: 50%

This report was created by AVInaptic (25-07-2011) on 12-02-2017 16:32:30

Sponsor
Inviato: Sunday, February 12, 2017 5:24:55 PM

 
cbbusto
Inviato: Sunday, February 12, 2017 6:54:49 PM

Rank: AiutAmico

Iscritto dal : 11/8/2008
Posts: 13,739
Dipende dove li devi vedere i video. Io preferisco gli Mp4 poi dipende dai codec. Io ho una videocamera in HD e li vedo in Mp4 codec H264, visione ottima anche su TV da 43 pollici FullHD.
Il primo è un po' meglio, Xvid è molto compresso e vederlo su uno shcermo un po' grande si vedrebbero dei difetti, diciamo che grandi differenze non ci sono.
Mentre su un ipod, tablet o pc con monitor piccoli non si noterebbero diferenze.
venac
Inviato: Sunday, February 12, 2017 7:23:05 PM
Rank: AiutAmico

Iscritto dal : 4/29/2014
Posts: 44
Su un tv 40 pollici FHD quale si vede meglio.
wolfestein
Inviato: Monday, February 13, 2017 12:02:41 AM

Rank: AiutAmico

Iscritto dal : 2/15/2009
Posts: 14,233
MP4 meglio degli XVID se sono filmati tratti da videocamera però potresti provare a convertirli in MKV anche questo è un buon codec.
venac
Inviato: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:16:41 AM
Rank: AiutAmico

Iscritto dal : 4/29/2014
Posts: 44
Ciao Wolf, grazie per la risposta.
Il video in questione è "Io sono vendetta", un film del 2016 di Travolta, che ho scaricato dalla rete.
Premesso che entrambi i formati si vedono benissimo sul mio tv 40 pollici FHD, io avrei una preferenza verso l'avi, in quanto il DFR è inferiore a 2 e lo standard deviation inferiore a 1, cioè massima qualità con doppia passata.
Cosa ne pensi?
Ciao
wolfestein
Inviato: Monday, February 13, 2017 3:10:57 PM

Rank: AiutAmico

Iscritto dal : 2/15/2009
Posts: 14,233
Qui si spiega le differenze tra i vari codec.
http://www.navigaweb.net/2015/03/differenze-tra-formati-video-avi-mkv.html
Io(opinione personale)preferisco lo MKV anche perché è supportato da quasi tutti i lettori e TV ma anche il metodo da te segnalato può andare benissimo se il file è di buona qualità.
Utenti presenti in questo topic
Guest


Salta al Forum
Aggiunta nuovi Topic disabilitata in questo forum.
Risposte disabilitate in questo forum.
Eliminazione tuoi Post disabilitata in questo forum.
Modifica dei tuoi post disabilitata in questo forum.
Creazione Sondaggi disabilitata in questo forum.
Voto ai sondaggi disabilitato in questo forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Aiutamici Theme
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net versione 1.9.1.8 (NET v2.0) - 3/29/2008
Copyright © 2003-2008 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.